Global power shifts: Geopolitical darwinism in the age of artificial intelligence

Last year, Chinese President Xi Jinping put forth his vision of a shared future for mankind – a world community that is open, inclusive and clean with lasting peace, stability and prosperity. His aspirations not only reflect the challenge to bring some form of order and governance to today’s interdependent and fragmented world but also underscore China’s desire to be recognised as a responsible global leader.

Virginie Maisonneuve, Chief Investment Officer
Eastspring Investments

Jun 2018


With the global environment experiencing intensification of key structural trends such as climate change, rapid population growth, ageing demographics, urban explosion and the evolution of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”), the geopolitical landscape shaping global competitiveness is changing. In particular, AI will in our view shape the “geopolitical Darwinism game” over the next 20 years and must be very closely followed by investors. In fact Russian President Putin recently said that “whoever becomes the leader in this sphere will become the ruler of the world”1.

AI and China

China has already set a target to become a world leader in AI by 20302. China’s motivations are real and clear and should not be underestimated. About 50% of China’s economic activity could be automated given the fast progression of narrow AI3. This combined with a rapidly ageing population projected to grow by 71% over 2015-2050 and increasing life expectancy, China is facing a large pension gap.

This gap is projected to increase from USD11trillion in 2015 to close to USD120trillion in 2050 - approximately 30% of the world’s estimated pension gap of USD400trillion4. It is therefore essential for the world’s second largest economy to align its strategy and reap benefits from AI.

The new “arms race”

Given AI’s potential, a new “arms race” is a possibility. To assess how different global players are equipped to compete in this race, four major factors should be assessed.

  • First is the availability of data essential to machine learning and feeding AI. In this area, China with over 740 million internet users in “one country” has the largest competitive advantage. The US is also in a good place with about 290 million users5. An important consideration is how easily companies can access this data; we believe the cost of data will increase over the next decade in contrast to it being “free” now.
  • Second, a favourable ecosystem is beneficial. For example, regulation regarding data usage and the ability for it to be referenced will be key competitive differentiators as will privacy laws and the cost of data. Here too China shows positive attributes.
  • Next is the level of technological skill and competitiveness. Interestingly, China produces twice as many graduates a year as the US. In particular, the growth of engineering students has been incredibly fast and in 2015 the top five highest paying graduate jobs were all tech-related, leading the way to attract more talent6. In 2015, Chinese scientists were already one of the largest academic contributors to AI with a global share of 43% of top papers in the field7 and over 16,000 patents. In 2016, China revealed it had built one of the fastest super computers, the Sunway TaihuLight Supercomputer, with the capability to make 93 quadrillion calculations a second, entirely powered by Chinese made processors8. China, however, remains vulnerable in the semiconductor space despite many attempted efforts to build the industry; it still imports over USD200billion worth of chips every year (larger than its oil imports). Catching up in the semiconductor space is therefore a top strategic priority for China and at the heart of the trade debate with the US.
  • Finally the availability of sufficient capital to fund research in AI and related fields is a key determinant of success in this area. Again, China is gaining competitive advantage; it just slashed taxes for chip makers and plans to invest as much as USD32billion in this space.

Given the above and the size of investment required to be AI-competitive, we believe we are moving towards a polarised world dominated by China and the US. We may then see a world where smaller and weaker countries need to align with larger ones and protectionist inclinations intensify to safeguard intellectual property.

Government as a service: A competitive edge?

The role of governments might also need to evolve with the integration of narrow AI into society. As the use of AI increases, it will impact the employment landscape dramatically and possibly much faster than most expect. A recent study suggested that up to 50% of current job roles could disappear by 20259, as will many companies and industries. The ability to handle and anticipate such changes and their impact will be a key component of geopolitical stability and relative power in the world.

Going forward, a large part of government functions will be serviced by AI in the form of “government as a service”. As a result, governments that understand the ramifications of AI and invest in training their people or encourage companies to do so for their employees will be at an advantage over time. Strong and responsible global leaders with a strategic and long-term vision will have to step up and manage these challenges to ensure worldwide stability. If countries cannot elect such visionaries, it is possible that a higher percentage of countries fall prey to dictatorship or populism.

Investment opportunities

Despite the possible dramatic geopolitical shifts in the coming years, AI will introduce new investment opportunities for investors as well as the options for enhanced processes and tools for asset managers. The changes generated by the AI revolution combined with genomics, nanotechnology and quantum computing are vast and point to Asia as a relative winner.

Moreover, another important factor is the ongoing growth of Asia’s capital markets. By 2027, Asia could become the top equity market region10; Asia’s market capitalisation, led by China/Hong Kong, could double to USD 56trillion overtaking the US and Canada. Asia ex Japan’s bond markets could hit USD10trillion which is the size of the Japan bond market. Mutual funds assets could total USD13trillion and insurance assets USD20trillion. In all of these projections, the game changer is the rapid growth projected for China.

We believe the 21st century will be “Asia’s century” shaped by economic, financial and geopolitical factors outlined above. Asset managers with the resources in place to build global and regional strategies that invest in these thematic trends will benefit from this evolving landscape.


Virginie Maisonneuve

Chief Investment Officer

Eastspring Investments

Source:
1https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/04/elon-musk-says-global-race-for-ai-will-be-most-likely-cause-of-ww3.html
2Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, The State Council
3Narrow AI is defined as AI that is good at performing a single task - https://bdtechtalks.com/2017/05/12/what-is-narrow-general-and-super-artificial-intelligence/
4http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_White_Paper_We_Will_Live_to_100.pdf
5https://www.statista.com/statistics/262966/number-of-internet-users-in-selected-countries as of June 2017
6https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/04/higher-education-in-china-has-boomed-in-the-last-decade
7https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/this-is-why-china-has-the-edge-in-ai/
8https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0620/How-China-built-world-s-fastest-computer-without-US-chips
9http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2826463/CBRE-report-warns-50-cent-occupations-redundant-20-years-time.html
10Morgan Stanley Institute for Sustainable Investing February 2015 report

This document is produced by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited and issued in:

Singapore and Australia (for wholesale clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore, is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence and is licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore under Singapore laws which differ from Australian laws.


Hong Kong by Eastspring Investments (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.


Indonesia by PT Eastspring Investments Indonesia, an investment manager that is licensed, registered and supervised by the Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK).


Malaysia by Eastspring Investments Berhad (531241-U).


United States of America (for institutional clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore and is registered with the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission as a registered investment adviser.


European Economic Area (for professional clients only) and Switzerland (for qualified investors only) by Eastspring Investments (Luxembourg) S.A., 26, Boulevard Royal, 2449 Luxembourg, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, registered with the Registre de Commerce et des Sociétés (Luxembourg), Register No B 173737.


United Kingdom (for professional clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Luxembourg) S.A. - UK Branch, 125 Old Broad Street, London EC2N 1AR.


Chile (for institutional clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore and is licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore under Singapore laws which differ from Chilean laws.


The afore-mentioned entities are hereinafter collectively referred to as Eastspring Investments.


The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Eastspring Investments’ communications. This document is solely for information purposes and does not have any regard to the specific investment objective, financial situation and/or particular needs of any specific persons who may receive this document. This document is not intended as an offer, a solicitation of offer or a recommendation, to deal in shares of securities or any financial instruments. It may not be published, circulated, reproduced or distributed without the prior written consent of Eastspring Investments. Reliance upon information in this posting is at the sole discretion of the reader. Please consult your own professional adviser before investing.

 

Investment involves risk. Past performance and the predictions, projections, or forecasts on the economy, securities markets or the economic trends of the markets are not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of Eastspring Investments or any of the funds managed by Eastspring Investments.


Information herein is believed to be reliable at time of publication. Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Eastspring Investments has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. Where lawfully permitted, Eastspring Investments does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and is not responsible for error of facts or opinion nor shall be liable for damages arising out of any person’s reliance upon this information. Any opinion or estimate contained in this document may subject to change without notice.


Eastspring Investments (excluding JV companies) companies are ultimately wholly-owned/indirect subsidiaries/associate of Prudential plc of the United Kingdom. Eastspring Investments companies (including JV’s) and Prudential plc are not affiliated in any manner with Prudential Financial, Inc., a company whose principal place of business is in the United States of America.