Climate change and Asia: An existential question?


While throughout the history of mankind, climate has played a significant role in the rise and fall of civilisations, the acceleration of climate issues in the 21st century is creating a puzzle that will be challenging to resolve given its global nature and large financial implications. It will have broad implications for investors. Governments too will be hard pressed to confront the significant economic implications of a changing climate.

May 2019

A stable and predictable climate facilitates complex civilisation to form and culture to be developed. Archaeological excavations show that in arid geographies, ancient cities with ample water sources had thrived as dessert outposts. The ancient city of Ubar was one such example - it eventually disappeared when water levels dipped, and a sink hole formed. Likewise, droughts have been linked to the fall of the Maya civilisation and the demise of the city of Angkor.

Today, the threat from climate change remains real and needs to be addressed.

Research shows that it is extremely likely that more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperate from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the increase in greenhouse gases arising from human activity1.

It is not so much the absolute change in temperature that is concerning but the pace of change. According to scientists, the level of atmospheric CO2 rose from 180 parts per million (ppm) after the last Ice Age to about 280 ppm at pre-industrialisation. Since then, the level has risen to over 400 ppm and is increasing by 2 ppm every year. See Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere2


This rapid change is likely to be beyond the adaptive capacity we possess and will significantly disrupt the global economy and population. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a 1.5oC average rise in temperature may put 20-30% of species at risk. If temperature rises by more than 3oC, most ecosystems will struggle.

As a result of global warming, Greenland has already lost an average of 281 billion tons of ice annually between 1993 and 2016 while Antarctica has lost around 119 billion tons over the same period3. In just over the last two decades, global sea levels have risen by 3.2 mm annually - twice the rate of rise experienced over the last century. The Asian Development Bank warns that continued inaction towards climate change issues will cause Sea Level Rise (SLR) to reach 1.4m by the end of 2100. Global flood losses are estimated to amount to USD52 billion by 2050.

Because of the lag between greenhouse emissions and the resulting impact on the climate, much of the global warming arising from the current level of greenhouse emissions has already been committed. Research suggests that current emissions reduction pledges by Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) would most likely result in a global mean temperature increase of approximately 2.7oC above pre-industrial levels by 2100. This would indicate that we are on a path to around 3oC of warming by the end of the century, even assuming substantial emissions reductions in the future4.

What about Asia?

The stakes with regards to climate change are particularly high for Asia. Research has established links between climate change and the observed frequency, intensity and duration of extreme weather events. Higher temperatures, for example, will intensify the water cycle and lead to more droughts and floods.

A disproportionately large share of Asia’s population and urban economy is located close to the coastline. Low lying coastal zones, for example, account for only 2% of China’s land mass but house 26% of the country’s population. See Fig. 2. Not only are coastal populations in many countries large, they are also growing at a faster rate than the national average. As such, by 2025, 401 million urban dwellers in Asia could be at risk from coastal flooding. Studies of 136 largest coastal cities in the world show that out of the top 20 cities with the largest increase in annual losses due to flooding between 2005 and 2050, 13 are in Asia. Guangzhou is the most impacted with an estimated USD13.2 billion in average annual losses5.

Fig. 2. Share of area and population of low-elevation coastal zones in Asia (%)6


Asia is also expected to experience stronger warming and heat extremes. With unabated climate change, mean summer temperatures are expected to increase by more than 6oC above preindustrial levels by the end of the 21st century over some parts of Asia, with temperature increases rising as high as 8oC in the higher latitudes7.

Climate change will also impact the monsoon system which is critical for the water supply over large parts of Asia. Asia could shift from a state of strong rainfall to a weak precipitation state. With 80% of India’s total annual rainfall taking place during the summer monsoon season, this could have significant impact on agricultural productivity and threaten food security. The Asian Development Bank estimates that for every 10% rise in food prices, 64 million Asians would be pushed into poverty.

Clearly a scenario of growing population and rising threat to food security leads to health risks. By 2030, an additional 3 billion consumers are expected to join Asia’s middle class and increase food demand by 70%. Without significant increases in food production, child malnutrition is expected to increase by about 20%.

Besides malnutrition, heat-related deaths among the elderly are expected to increase by 20,000 cases annually by 2030 and deaths resulting from diarrheal diseases due to climate change are forecast to rise by 8000 cases annually. The risk of diarrheal diseases rises between 3 to 11% for every 1oC increase in temperature8. Attributable mortality related to vector-borne diseases (malaria and dengue) are estimated to be on the order of 10,000 annual deaths by 2050. See Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Impact of climate change on Asia


Adaptation versus mitigation

Mitigation and adaption are the two principal ways to deal with the effect of climate change. Mitigation involves trying to reduce and stabilise the level of greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere. This includes reducing sources of these gases by burning less fossil fuels or enhancing the “sinks” (e.g. oceans, forests and soil) that accumulate and store these gases. The Indonesian government, for example, has imposed a three-year freeze on new palm oil concession permits.

Adaptation on the other hand, seeks to adapt to life in a changing climate. The goal is to reduce society’s vulnerability to the harmful effects of climate change. This includes water conservation, flood defence, development of drought resilient crops. The average cost of adaption in Asia Pacific’s health sector for the treatment and prevention of diarrhoea and malaria is estimated around USD0.65 billion to USD0.8 billion between 2030 and 2050. Adaptation also includes making the most of any potential beneficial opportunities associated with climate change (for example, longer growing seasons or increased yields in some regions).

Research suggests that mitigation alone in the absence of adaptive measures would still result in great vulnerability. At the same time, much of the world will likely suffer extreme vulnerability to climate change in the absence of any mitigation efforts, regardless of what adaptive measures are taken9.

A combination of adaptation and mitigation could reduce vulnerability to modest levels for most of the world.

Investors act on climate change

Investors and asset owners are increasing their impact on climate change and their efforts are gaining momentum.

For example, in August 2018, 90 institutional investors with a total of USD6.7 trillion of assets under management, called on the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil to ban deforestation. Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global has since divested from 33 palm oil companies over deforestation risks and is currently asking banks in Indonesia and Malaysia to adopt a no deforestation criteria when extending loans.

In a recent survey of long-term investors conducted by the IIF Council for Asset and Investment Management10, over 75% of participants reported that environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles are becoming an increasingly important factor in long-term asset allocation decisions, a notable increase from 60% a year ago.

Another poll conducted by the UK Sustainable Investment and Finance Association (UKSIF) and the Climate Change Collaboration found that only 18% of the fund managers surveyed believed that oil companies would be good investments if their businesses were still focused on fossil fuels in five years’ time. Nearly a quarter of respondents, however, did not see oil companies as good investments in any timeframe.

The wider adoption of ESG integration will eventually result in changes in broad benchmarks, favouring lower weights for climate-forcing companies and sectors. Already, a number of large asset owners have adopted ESG indices for their investments. In 2017, SwissRe implemented ESG-based benchmarks across its entire USD130 billion investment portfolio. This followed the move by the Japan Pension Government Investment Fund (GPIF) to track three ESG indices for around ¥1 trillion of Japanese equity investments.

In the US, the total US-domiciled assets under management using socially responsible investing (SRI) strategies grew 38% over two years to USD12 trillion in 2018. This represents about a quarter of total assets under management11.

As investors make investments into the low carbon transition across a range of asset classes, and increasingly incorporate climate change scenarios and climate risk management strategies into their investment processes, having a generally agreed set of definitions, standards and methodologies will help build on the momentum. As such, improving climate-related financial reporting standards by publicly supporting and implementing the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) is critical. Ultimately elements of natural resources capital and sustainability will become the “new normal” in company analysis, portfolio and risk management.

Governments in the spotlight

On 15 March this year, tens of thousands of children across 100 countries participated in the Global Climate Strike for the Future, demanding that adults and governments take responsibility and stop climate change. In the UK, Extinction Rebellion, a group which uses non-violence resistance to protest against climate breakdown, biodiversity loss, and ecological collapse, occupied four prominent sites in central London. These social movements should not be dismissed and are likely to grow in the future.

A 2018 Pew study showed that 81% of millennials believe that the earth is warming and 65% of those millennials attribute it mainly to human activity. That is about 10% higher than the general public. According to the study, millennials also factor climate change into their decisions at the poll. With millennials accounting for 50% of the global workforce and controlling about USD24 trillion of the world’s private wealth by 205012, climate change will be a key topic for politicians, alongside economic growth, jobs, wages and inflation.

This is already seen in the US where the “Green New Deal”, which requires significant public investment and government regulations to decarbonise the American economy appears to have exceptional bi-partisan support. As of December 2018, 89 representatives and 11 senators have co-sponsored the resolution, including at least five declared presidential candidates13. In France, following the emergence of the Gilets Jaunes movement, the government is engaging in national conversation on climate change and inequality.

A climate of change

Climate challenges will enable change, but given the multi-faceted issues, a concerted effort by governments, companies, investors and society is needed. Fund managers who fail to align their processes to integrate new risk factors and the sustainability of capital on a holistic basis, including natural resources capital, might lose their competitive edge over the long run. Managers also need to continue to develop effective engagement strategies to change the behaviours of climate-forcing companies. At the same time, the tone of the climate battle has shifted in recent months, where the public, especially millennials and the young, are increasingly demanding that governments take greater initiative in addressing the climate threat. An effective transition to a lower carbon and more sustainable economy will need important changes and specifically collaboration from various stakeholders in a way we have not seen before.

1 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
4 Gutschow et al. 2015. Pledges are to mitigate emissions of greenhouses gases. As of 2017, 185 countries have submitted pledges. These countries represent approximately 97% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
5 Hallegatte et. al. 2013
6 LECZ: Low elevation coastal zone, PRC = People’s Republic of China. Adapted from B. Neumann et. Al. 2015. Future Coastal Population Growth and Exposure to Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Flooding – A Global Assessment.
7 A region at risk. The human dimensions of climate change in Asia and the Pacific.
8 World Health Organisation. 2014. Quantitative Risk Assessment of the Effects of Climate Change on Selected Causes of Death.
10 IIF Council for Asset and Investment Management. Survey of Long-Term Investors – 1H 2019.
11 US SIF Foundation 2018 Report.
12 UBS Report “Millennials: The Global Guardians of Capital”.

This document is produced by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited and issued in:

Singapore by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H)

Australia (for wholesale clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore, is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence and is licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore under Singapore laws which differ from Australian laws

Hong Kong by Eastspring Investments (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Indonesia by PT Eastspring Investments Indonesia, an investment manager that is licensed, registered and supervised by the Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK).

Malaysia by Eastspring Investments Berhad (531241-U).

Thailand by Eastspring Asset Management (Thailand) Co., Ltd.

United States of America (for institutional clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore and is registered with the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission as a registered investment adviser.

European Economic Area (for professional clients only) and Switzerland (for qualified investors only) by Eastspring Investments (Luxembourg) S.A., 26, Boulevard Royal, 2449 Luxembourg, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, registered with the Registre de Commerce et des Sociétés (Luxembourg), Register No B 173737.

United Kingdom (for professional clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Luxembourg) S.A. - UK Branch, 10 Lower Thames Street, London EC3R 6AF.

Chile (for institutional clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore and is licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore under Singapore laws which differ from Chilean laws.

The afore-mentioned entities are hereinafter collectively referred to as Eastspring Investments.

The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Eastspring Investments’ communications. This document is solely for information purposes and does not have any regard to the specific investment objective, financial situation and/or particular needs of any specific persons who may receive this document. This document is not intended as an offer, a solicitation of offer or a recommendation, to deal in shares of securities or any financial instruments. It may not be published, circulated, reproduced or distributed without the prior written consent of Eastspring Investments. Reliance upon information in this document is at the sole discretion of the reader. Please carefully study the related information and/or consult your own professional adviser before investing.

Investment involves risks. Past performance of and the predictions, projections, or forecasts on the economy, securities markets or the economic trends of the markets are not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of Eastspring Investments or any of the funds managed by Eastspring Investments.

Information herein is believed to be reliable at time of publication. Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Eastspring Investments has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. Where lawfully permitted, Eastspring Investments does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and is not responsible for error of facts or opinion nor shall be liable for damages arising out of any person’s reliance upon this information. Any opinion or estimate contained in this document may subject to change without notice.

Eastspring Investments companies (excluding joint venture companies) are ultimately wholly owned/indirect subsidiaries of Prudential plc of the United Kingdom. Eastspring Investments companies (including joint venture companies) and Prudential plc are not affiliated in any manner with Prudential Financial, Inc., a company whose principal place of business is in the United States of America or with the Prudential Assurance Company Limited, a subsidiary of M&G plc (a company incorporated in the United Kingdom).