April market review: Not out of the woods yet

Global equities bounced back in April as the number of new Covid-19 cases around the world began to flatten and lockdown procedures began to loosen but a collapse in crude oil prices reminds investors that we’re not out of the woods yet.

  • As the number of new Covid-19 cases around the world began to flatten and lockdown procedures began to loosen, global equities bounced back in April with some of the stronger markets erasing anything from half to two-thirds of the losses they’d seen in March. A modest “risk-on” atmosphere prevailed for most of the month despite dire economic figures and a collapse in crude oil prices as monetary accommodation programmes and fiscal stimuli programmes worth more than US$14tn flooded the market with cheap money, and ultimately giving the basis for future economic recovery.
  • Global monetary policy accommodation worth $7tn included eleven emerging market central banks cutting rates in April and the US Fed pledging to “do what it could” to support the domestic economy – and seeing its balance sheet rising $2.4tn in just two months to pay for it. Fiscal programmes included the US Congress passing four major stimulus packages to add to a vast array of global fiscal stimuli, which among other consequences, caused EM currencies to rally somewhat against the US dollar, providing another layer of support for equities. On the negative side, bond yields globally stayed stubbornly low with the US Treasury yield ending a smidge lower at 0.64%.
  • The near collapse in oil prices reminded investors they were not out of the woods when it comes to global economic recovery. WTI crude, the blend commonly used in the US, collapsed at one point to -$37.63/bbl when record oversupply and storage in the main US inventory-reserve town of Cushing coming very close to capacity as demand for oil fell off a cliff. All this despite an OPEC agreement at the beginning of the month to curtail production. Brent prices, the blend more commonly used in Europe and Asia, also fell very sharply but just about held onto $20/bbl by the end of the month.
  • As well as the economic catalysts, another driver behind the equity rally was the encouraging results on a potential treatment for Covid-19 from remdesivir, an existing anti-viral drug made by Gilead Sciences in the US. The trial showed 50% of patients treated with the drug for fives days showed a notable improvement and was enough to propel Gilead stock 15% higher over the month. Meanwhile, anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine showed poor results in a clinical trial.
  • In other news, elections in Korea saw the ruling Democratic Party winning an absolute majority in parliamentary elections. Trade tensions between the US and China ratcheted up again when the White House blamed China for spreading Covid-19 and hinted of new trade sanctions in retaliation. Political tensions in Brazil rose when President Bolsonaro fired his Health Minister after weeks of clashes between the two over the country’s Covid-19 response, then the popular Justice Minister also later resigned.

Equity Markets

  • Global Equity markets bounced back in April to record a 10.8% gain, its best monthly performance in more than eight years. Developed Markets, and especially the US, outperformed Emerging Markets reflecting both a severe drawdown in March in DMs, and the scale of stimuli programmes in the US. The MSCI Developed Markets index added 11%, the US 13.2% and EMs rose 9.2%. However, for the year to date, many major global markets – ex the US, China and Taiwan – are still down double-digit percentage points.
  • For the three months of the Covid crisis (February to April), the US is down just 7.7% versus Europe down 17.5% and Asia ex Japan which has fallen 5.9%. The colossal stimuli plan and tentative steps by some US states to reopen their economies are largely behind the outperformance while Europe has underwhelmed as the EU disappointed some on its economic response.
  • Europe’s lacklustre country performance also reflects the continent’s struggles in opening its economies, with a notable outperformance in Austria (+10.6%) that is so far the only country to free up restrictions in any meaningful way. Italy (+1.9%) and Spain (+1.5%) epitomised this while France (+4.4%) underperformed Germany (+9.8%). The UK found support from its large-cap dollar earners but still only managed a 5.1% gain as Brits remained at home.
  • In contrast, Emerging Markets had their best month in four years. China saw a 6.3% gain for April and for the year-to-date is down just 4.5% – the best performing market globally – and has now recovered 56% of its losses for the year, in line with that of the US. Korea gained 8.2% for a second straight month of gains with utilities and material stocks outperforming on the collapsing oil price. Taiwan added 14.4% as its large tech stocks gained from a recovery of smartphone demand and China’s aggressive 5G ramp up amid the work-from-home trend, and although Indonesia shone in ASEAN as its currency recovered, Thailand outperformed with a 16.1% gain on a well-received stimuli package.
  • Latin America also rebounded with a 6.3% advance but still underperformed, dragged by another weak performance in Brazil (+5.4%) after the resignation of its Justice Minister raised its political instability. Mexico gained just 4.3% as the peso remained under pressure. The EMEA region rose 11%, after a 13.2% gain in South Africa as a lockdown easing plan was announced and a stimulus package launched, and after an 11.5% bounce in Russia on a stronger rouble and interest rate cut.
  • In other markets, Australia surged back with a 15.3% gain as some states looked to reopen and the stimulus packages began to feed through to the economy. India recorded a 16.1% rise to regain almost two-thirds of its losses in March and after the RBI gave a “do whatever it takes” message. Japan underperformed other DMs to put on just 5.4% as it struggled with new Covid-19 cases numbers.

Fixed Income

  • Core government bond yields trended lower in April, as pandemic-related fears lingered and the unexpected plunge in US oil futures into negative territory drove unsettled investors towards safe-haven assets. Providing some counterbalance were tentative signs that the number of virus infections and deaths were stabilising, fuelling hopes that some US states and European countries could start easing their social distancing measures. This sparked brief periods of improved risk appetite that limited downside to bond yields.
  • During the month, bond market sentiment was further bolstered by the announcement of additional fiscal and monetary stimulus measures as economic data disappointed and global growth outlooks were slashed. In the US, March data showed signs of weakness in the labour market: a record plunge in retail sales and manufacturing output falling by the most in 74 years. Industry bellwethers also delayed earnings forecasts and suspended dividend payments as the virus outbreak took a toll on businesses. Against this backdrop, the Federal Reserve (Fed) announced it was injecting another US$2.3tn into the economy. Over the month, US Treasury (UST) yields mostly fell, with the benchmark 10-year yield dipping 3 bps to end at 0.64%. Government bond yields in Germany and the UK also declined.
  • In Asia, local-currency government bond yields were lower, boosting markets’ total returns. With forecasts for weaker economic growth and even contraction this year, governments including those in South Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong continued to roll out further stimulus. Monetary policy also eased further. China’s central bank led the way, reducing its main one-year loan prime and five-year loan prime rates, as well as the rates on its medium-term lending facilities. It also lowered the amount of cash banks must hold as reserves.
  • The Philippines trimmed its key rates earlier than anticipated. Indonesia kept rates unchanged but announced cuts to the amount of IDR domestic banks must hold in reserves. On a total return basis, Philippine local rates led the rally in Asia helped by improved risk sentiment in emerging markets, while Malaysia and Singapore also outperformed. Conversely, South Korean, Taiwan and Hong Kong local rates underperformed.
  • Emerging market USD credit markets rebounded as indiscriminate selling in the prior month had opened value in some segments of the market. In addition, investors were encouraged by news that the additional stimulus the Fed planned to inject into the US economy (US$500bn) would be via its purchase of high yield corporate debt for the first time ever. This provided a boost to US high yield corporate bonds that also benefited their Asian high yield counterparts in turn. Indeed, Asian high yield corporates outperformed all other segments in April on the back of spread narrowing of around 100 bps. Conversely, investment grade bonds underperformed.
Macro-Briefing-MB_Bond Returns_USD_MQY_apr


  • The US dollar Index (DXY) had a relatively quiet month compared against recent history and ended the month almost flat from its starting point, allowing many of the beaten-up Emerging Market currencies to regain some ground. Continuing supportive messages from the Fed countered weaker bond yields to give the dollar a more balanced month following the “dash-for-cash” in March, while the unprecedented macro policies and some lockdown exit plans began supporting riskier assets at the expense of the dollar.
  • The Japanese yen also had a quieter month after the BoJ announced new supportive measures focused on corporate financing, giving banks and the yen a boost. Sterling also gained to recoup almost all of its losses in March to trade around the same levels as when the pandemic began. The euro fell slightly against the dollar has the Eurozone’s fiscal stimuli package failed to inspire. The Australian dollar surged reflecting solid equity index gains, domestic stimulus programmes, and the restart of some Asian economies. The AUD was the best performing developed market currencies against the USD during the month.
  • Emerging Market currencies were mixed but overall fell again slightly against the dollar with low-yielding currencies generally outperforming high-yielders. Latin America and EMEA saw further pressure with Mexico’s peso leading the losses in Latam after Moody’s downgraded its sovereign debt to Baa1 from A, and following negative comments from other agencies earlier in the year. The Brazilian real came under more pressure with the falling crude price and growing political instability. Other Latam currencies found support and gained slightly with Chile outstanding on an improving macro and political environment.
  • EMEA saw the South Africa rand come under more pressure after a rating agency downgraded its debt rating to “junk” status while Russia’s rouble gained almost 6% despite the collapse in crude after the government announced further stimulus measures to counter the economic contraction.
  • Asia currencies were stronger against the dollar across the board but the gains were modest except for Indonesia’s rupiah. Currencies more aligned with the renminbi strengthened a little with Korea’s won up 1.7% and the Taiwan dollar gaining 1.7%. India’s rupee rose 0.7% as crude collapsed and the RBI gave a supportive communication on economic stimuli. Meanwhile, the tightly controlled renminbi held steady at around Rmb7/US$1. The Indonesian rupiah, meanwhile, gained 9.6% to offset some of the 21% depreciation in Q1 as the central bank reached an agreement with the Fed for a $60bn repurchase facility and on a general sentiment improvement on riskier EM assets.
Macro-Briefing-MB_Central-Bank IR_CC_apr


  • Oil prices plummeted during the month with the US-based WTI falling to a negative $37.63/bbl at one point as the May Futures contract expired, and traders wanted to avoid physical delivery at a time when storage tanks in the US were filling up fast. But June contracts also fell very sharply and ended the month at $12.30, while Brent also fell to finish at $20.50. Lower-than-expected storage data gave some support at month-end but otherwise it was the worst ever month for crude.
  • Gold prices rose again as it benefitted from the global stimulus programmes and begins to act as a hedge against inflation and currency debasement as the economic stimulus kicks in. This kept momentum for much of the month as the dollar stayed flat and bond yields fell again, although it eased back somewhat in the final week as economies eased restrictions.
  • Other metals had a quieter month with copper gaining some footing as the China economy opened further. Iron ore was flat although is still outperforming for the year and, while the overall Commodities index dipped for the third month in a row because of oil, the S&P Industrial metals index gained 1.4% on some better industrial news from China.
  • Coal prices finally fell after holding their elevated prices as soft demand in India and China sent Asian coal prices to multi-year lows, and almost 30% down from their 2020 highs. Australian coal, popular in Japan and South Korea is down 24% from the year’s highs. Asia LNG prices also fell sharply in April and are now down over 70% from their 2020 highs.


  • US GDP fell at an annualised rate of 4.8% in Q1 as unemployment reached more than 30 million, dwarfing any other recession in US history. Driving the drop in GDP was the record contraction in services consumption which fell 10% on an annualized basis in Q1 and which fell again in April, signaling another sharp GDP decline in Q2. Consumer confidence fell the most ever despite some states’ economies slowing reopening.
  • The Fed opened swap lines with the world’s major central banks to help US dollar funding which had frozen during the “dash for cash”, allowing the Fed to provide dollars to overseas banks and increase the timing of transactions to daily from weekly. Canada, the UK, Eurozone, Japan, Switzerland and Korea were included in the plan.
  • The ECB and the BoJ were among the central banks pledging to purchase as many government bonds as needed in order to stimulate their economies. Meanwhile, data from Europe showed manufacturing and services PMI levels falling to record lows and indicating a very big contraction in European GDP this year. UK PMI levels also tanked: Services PMI fell to 12.3 from 34.5 in March, manufacturing fell to 32.6 from 47.8 taking the composite to 12.9.
  • China’s GDP contracted by 6.8% in Q1 (-9.8% in constant prices qoq) and, while April indicators pointed to a recovery, they did hint at problems ahead; April PMI fell to 50.8 from 52 in March signaling the economy may be struggling to grow as the rest of the world remained in lockdown and as exports fell again. Manufacturing PMI fell slightly but the services element rose again.
  • Spain’s GDP contracted 9.2% qoq in Q1 (-5.2% qoq) with unemployment hitting 14.4%. Italy’s GDP fell 4.7% but is expected to fall further in Q2. South Korea’s Q1 GDP fell 5.5% but the BoK kept interest rates steady. Russia cut interest rates by 50bps, one of many central banks to cut rates again during the month.
Macro-Briefing-MB_MSCI-AC World-12m-Forward-PE_CC_apr



How to invest in Eastspring's fund(s)

Eastspring Investments. Chart data from Refinitiv Datastream as of as of 30 April 2020.
2 Eastspring Investments. Chart data from Refinitiv Datastream as of 30 April 2020. For representative indices and acronym details please refer to notes in the appendix. Quoted returns are MSCI, US dollar denominated total returns.
3 Eastspring Investments. Chart data from Refinitiv Datastream as of as of 30 April 2020. For representative indices and acronym details please refer to notes in the appendix. For representative indices and acronym details please refer to notes in the appendix.
Eastspring Investments, Refinitiv Datastream as of 30 April 2020.
5 Eastspring Investments. Chart data from Refinitiv Datastream as of 30 April 2020.
6 Eastspring Investments. Chart data using IBES estimates from Refinitiv Datastream as of 30 April 2020.
7 Eastspring Investments. Chart data from Refinitiv Datastream as of 30 April 2020. Data and commentary prepared by Peter Bennett.


This document is produced by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited and issued in:

Singapore and Australia (for wholesale clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore, is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence and is licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore under Singapore laws which differ from Australian laws.

Hong Kong by Eastspring Investments (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Indonesia by PT Eastspring Investments Indonesia, an investment manager that is licensed, registered and supervised by the Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK).

Malaysia by Eastspring Investments Berhad (531241-U).

This document is produced by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited and issued in Thailand by TMB Asset Management Co., Ltd. Investment contains certain risks; investors are advised to carefully study the related information before investing. The past performance of any the fund is not indicative of future performance.

United States of America (for institutional clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore and is registered with the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission as a registered investment adviser.

European Economic Area (for professional clients only) and Switzerland (for qualified investors only) by Eastspring Investments (Luxembourg) S.A., 26, Boulevard Royal, 2449 Luxembourg, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, registered with the Registre de Commerce et des Sociétés (Luxembourg), Register No B 173737.

United Kingdom (for professional clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Luxembourg) S.A. - UK Branch, 10 Lower Thames Street, London EC3R 6AF.

Chile (for institutional clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore and is licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore under Singapore laws which differ from Chilean laws.

The afore-mentioned entities are hereinafter collectively referred to as Eastspring Investments.

The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Eastspring Investments’ communications. This document is solely for information purposes and does not have any regard to the specific investment objective, financial situation and/or particular needs of any specific persons who may receive this document. This document is not intended as an offer, a solicitation of offer or a recommendation, to deal in shares of securities or any financial instruments. It may not be published, circulated, reproduced or distributed without the prior written consent of Eastspring Investments. Reliance upon information in this posting is at the sole discretion of the reader. Please consult your own professional adviser before investing.

Investment involves risk. Past performance and the predictions, projections, or forecasts on the economy, securities markets or the economic trends of the markets are not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of Eastspring Investments or any of the funds managed by Eastspring Investments.

Information herein is believed to be reliable at time of publication. Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Eastspring Investments has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. Where lawfully permitted, Eastspring Investments does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and is not responsible for error of facts or opinion nor shall be liable for damages arising out of any person’s reliance upon this information. Any opinion or estimate contained in this document may subject to change without notice.

Eastspring Investments (excluding JV companies) companies are ultimately wholly-owned/indirect subsidiaries/associate of Prudential plc of the United Kingdom. Eastspring Investments companies (including JV’s) and Prudential plc are not affiliated in any manner with Prudential Financial, Inc., a company whose principal place of business is in the United States of America or with the Prudential Assurance Company, a subsidiary of M&G plc (a company incorporated in the United Kingdom).